Anyone actually at the booth, or just watching the holes from here?
@handlebar · · 0 replies
Investor discussion of San Lorenzo Gold Corp. (TSXV:SLG): reactions to drill results, financings and press releases, sentiment and price targets from the OreStocks mining-stock community.
@handlebar · · 0 replies
@cliff70 · · 1 replies
Half a billion on this few holes, fair to be nervous about that. Then you count the porphyry centres sitting on the property and it makes more sense. Both can be true at once.
@coreloggin · · 0 replies
final numbers on 10-25 are out. they pushed it past 700m because it was still in mineralisation at depth. that tells you more than the headline interval imo. a geo doesnt call in a favour for another 200m of rods unless the rock is asking for it. thats the part i care about.
@night_owl42 · · 1 replies
@cliff70 · · 0 replies
@coreloggin · · 0 replies
@eric885 · · 1 replies
@coreloggin · · 1 replies
the next two holes from $SLG.V are where the thesis consolidates or splits. 10 set up the textural read, 11 and 12 have to demonstrate continuity at depth not just along strike, that distinction is what determines the eventual resource shape and the rerating math from this…
@coreloggin · · 0 replies
@eric885 · · 0 replies
102.3m of porphyry mineralisation across holes 9 and 10 on arco de oro. the system is wider than the first holes suggested.
@cliff70 · · 2 replies
$SLG.V reminds me of how filo del sol traded in the months after hole 41. similar setting, similar early debates. not predicting anything, just paying attention to how the pattern develops
@coreloggin · · 0 replies
anyone watching the treasury situation on $SLG.V? would rather see them top up sooner than later if drilling extends past the original budget
@coreloggin · · 1 replies
hole 10 at $SLG.V is doing the right thing at depth. phyllic cap with potassic taking over toward the bottom of the column. that's the porphyry zoning you want when the next hole is being planned
@coreloggin · · 0 replies