OreStocks

TinOne Resources Inc. press release

TINONE REPORTS COMPLETION OF SUCCESSFUL PHASE 1 DRILL PROGRAM AND DISCUSSES FUTURE PLANS FOR ITS GREAT PYRAMID TIN PROJECT, TASMANIA, AUSTRALIA

TSXV - TSX Venture Exchange · Tin · Tungsten · Bismuth · Arsenic · Zinc · Gold · Canada

Canada NewsWire

TSX.V: TORC OTCQB: TORCF

VANCOUVER, BC , Feb. 2, 2023 /CNW/ - TinOne Resources Inc. (TSXV: TORC) (OTCQB: TORCF) (" TinOne " or the " Company ") is pleased to announce it has completed its Phase 1 drill program at its Great Pyramid Tin (Sn) Project (" Great Pyramid " or the " Project ") located in the tier one mining jurisdiction of Tasmania, Australia .

Drilling has now concluded with a total of 4,687 metres completed and data compilation and modelling are underway. The program has been successful in continuing to define significant tin mineralization near surface, at depth and adjacent to historical drilling.

Highlights

Great Pyramid mineralization extended to approximately 380 metres below surface. Interpreted granite source not encountered, therefore mineralization remains entirely open at depth. Mineral Resources Tasmania geophysical modelling interprets granite at depth below Great Pyramid in the range of 700 – 1300 metres. Mineralization remains open in all directions laterally. Integrated stratigraphic-structural model being developed to assist numeric modelling.

"We are very pleased to have completed our Great Pyramid Phase 1 drill program safely and within budget," commented Chris Donaldson , Executive Chairman. "The results of the program have been outstanding in delivering consistent tin intersections from within the area of historical activity and, importantly, outside this area. These results and geological interpretation indicate that the Great Pyramid system is of significant scale and has only been partially tested, to date. Our geological team is developing its detailed interpretation and will be using this information to plan our next phases of drilling which will be focussed on fully testing the system."

Key Results

The 2022 program was designed to:

Test the depth and lateral dimensions of mineralization within the vicinity of the historical drilling and resource estimate; Obtain grade and continuity data utilising modern drill and analytical techniques, within the area of the historic exploration activity; and Test a large-scale IP chargeability anomaly adjacent to the historic resource.

Tables 1 and 2 present full results from the 2022 program and compiled results from all historical drilling known from the Great Pyramid area. The tables show that the 2022 program returned results in line with historical data and includes outstanding intersections of higher grade such as:

22GPRC012 78 metres @0.51% Sn (see Company news release September 06, 2022 ) 22GPRC016 51 metres @0.29% Sn (see Company news release September 06, 2022 ) 22GPRC021 14 metres @0.36% Sn (see Company news release January 18, 2023 ) 22GPRC022 15 metres @0.45% Sn (see Company news release October 11, 2022 ).

The 2022 Great Pyramid drill program was highly successful in confirming the presence and tenor of significant tin mineralization in the area of historical drilling activity and historical resource estimate. Weighted average tin grade for all 2022 recorded intersections 1 was 0.23% Sn which is in accord with historical drill data (Tables 1 and 2).

In addition, the program successfully defined significant mineralization at depth below the historical resource estimate in the area of sparse historical drilling. Highlights at depth included:

22GPRC003 (see Company news release November 22, 2022 ) 22GPRC006 (see Company news release September 06, 2022 )

These TinOne drill holes and the historical data have not defined the lower limit of the system, which remains entirely open at depth.

A relatively minor component of the program was directed to testing the lateral extent of mineralization due to access, with the network of historical drill access tracks being utilized to obtain a more cost effective drill program for this first round of drilling. However, despite this, the program has also delivered significant results laterally away from the historical drilling and resource estimate, with highlights including:

22GPRC021 (see Company news release January 18, 2023 ) 22GPRC002 (see Company news release June 29, 2022 )

These drill holes and historical drill data have not defined the lateral limits of the Great Pyramid system, which remains open laterally in all directions (Figure 2).

| _ | | 1 See Table 1 and 2 notes for parameters. | | |

Three drill holes (22GPDD010, 22GPRC018A, 22GPRC019, 22GPDD023) were drilled (for a total of 1275.9 metres) to test IP chargeability anomalies to the northeast and east of the area of historical exploration activity. These holes intersected sedimentary rocks of the Mathinna Supergroup with strong hornfels effects at depth and variable amounts of pyrite (interpreted to be both diagenetic and hydrothermal) and minor base metal sulphides. No significant tin mineralization was encountered. The chargeability anomalies may be explained by the presence of pyrite, however more detailed analysis, including petrophysical property measurements, will be undertaken and integration into the broader Great Pyramid geological model undertaken.

Geological Interpretation

The tin systems of northeastern Tasmania are regarded as classical examples of granite-related tin-polymetallic systems (Taylor, R.G. 1979, The geology of tin deposits ). Well known systems such as Anchor (Taheri and Bottrill, 2005, Devonian granites and associated mineralization in northeast and northwest Tasmania ), Aberfoyle 2 , Lutwyche 2, Story's Creek 2 , Rex Hill 2 (see TinOne news release July 07, 2022 ) and Royal George 2 are hosted in or directly associated with Devonian granites of the S-type alkali feldspar suite and it is generally regarded that the granites are the source of hydrothermal fluids and metals for formation of the systems. In the Aberfoyle , Lutwyche and Story's Creek systems, the bulk of mineralization is hosted in Mathinna Supergroup sedimentary rocks above the granite body, with deeper mining levels and drilling demonstrating the connection. In these systems a clear zoning from tin-rich at higher levels above the granite zoning downward to higher tungsten content adjacent to and within the granite. The Aberfoyle system is known over a vertical extent of in excess of 300 metres.

It is highly significant that in most respects (mineralogy, metal association, alteration character), the Great Pyramid system conforms to the granite-related model, yet no granite has yet been encountered in the project area.

Mineral Resources Tasmania (MRT) developed an integrated geophysical and geological model for the Scamander Mineral Field, including Great Pyramid (Scamander 3D geological and geophysical model). The Great Pyramid system occurs on a steep gradient ("shoulder") in the MRT model, and the model estimated that the upper granite surface exists at between 700 and 1300 metres below the Great Pyramid system (Figure 3). ( https://www.mrt.tas.gov.au/geoscience/3d_geological_and_geophysical_modelling/scamander_3d_geological_and_geophysical_modelling ).

The TinOne 2022 drill program provided support for this model and the granite association of the Great Pyramid system with the key evidence being the consistent presence in deeper holes of spotted hornfels 3 . However, despite drilling to depths of almost 400 metres below surface, no granite has yet been encountered at Great Pyramid. In the other Mathinna Supergroup hosted systems in Tasmania (e.g. Aberfoyle , Lutwyche, Story's Creek), mineralization continues to the granite contact and also within the granite. By comparison (and in context of the MRT model and observed geology), it can be interpreted that the Great Pyramid system may extend for a significant distance below current drill levels and potentially continue into the interpreted underlying granite.

| | | 2 See https://tinone.ca/project/aberfoyle-tin-resource/ | | 3 Hornfels – a contact metamorphic rock formed by the heating of sedimentary (or other) rocks by the intrusion of a magma, including granite. | | |

The mineralization encountered to date at Great Pyramid is interpreted to have two inter-related control mechanisms (Figure 4).

1. Structure - north easterly striking, steeply dipping structures (TinOne observations, historical exploration reports by Aberfoyle Ltd and BHP Ltd) that transect the sedimentary package and are interpreted to have acted as conduits for mineralizing hydrothermal fluids arising from the granite at depth. 2. Sedimentary rock type - not all of the sedimentary sequence is equally favourable for the production of elevated tin grades and therefore certain units are more strongly mineralized. These units tend to be the more quartz-rich sandstone parts of the sequence and it is interpreted that their brittle fracture patterns within the favourable structural domains promotes mineralization. A challenge is that the Mathinna Supergroup sedimentary rocks were strongly folded at a time before intrusion of the granite magma and formation of the related mineralization.

The interaction of the folded sedimentary geometries, structural zones and interpreted granite is schematically shown in Figure 4. The figure highlights the potential geometries and relationships expected at Great Pyramid and illustrates why in some places the mineralization is more laterally continuous than in other places. The figure also illustrates that, based on knowledge from other deposits in northeastern Tasmania , mineralization could be expected to continue in favourable host rocks into the interpreted granite contact.

Next Steps

With the successful completion of the Phase 1 drill program, the TinOne technical team has significantly advanced its understanding of the Great Pyramid system and focus has now shifted to interpretation and integration of the various data sets. This interpretation and modelling phase will develop an understanding of the inter-related controls discussed above and guide more efficient targeting of additional drilling and future resource estimation.

TinOne has engaged a PhD-trained expert in the structural geology of northeastern Tasmania and a PhD-trained expert sedimentologist to work together with the TinOne team and an external resource geologist to develop an integrated structural-sedimentological-geostatistical model. This model will inform additional drilling, principally targeting lateral extensions and a resource estimation at the appropriate time.

_Table 1: __TinOne Resources Great Pyramid RC and core drill results. _

| Hole | Intersection width (m) | From (m) | Sn (%) | Comments | | 22GPDD001A | 23 | 0 | 0.23 | Diamond cored hole. Inside historical resource area | | | 26 | 29 | 0.22 | Diamond cored hole. Inside historical resource area | | | 11 | 61 | 0.45 | Diamond cored hole. Inside historical resource area | | | 8 | 120 | 0.28 | Diamond cored hole. Inside historical resource area | | | 5 | 148 | 0.38 | Diamond cored hole. Below historical resource area | | 22GPRC002 | 14 | 3 | 0.18 | Outside historical resource area | | | 6 | 24 | 0.22 | Outside historical resource area | | 22GPRC003 | 39 | 3 | 0.25 | Inside historical resource area | | Incl | 16 | 18 | 0.34 | | | | 18 | 308 | 0.31 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | | 5.4 | 330.6 | 0.46 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | | 13 | 359 | 0.22 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | | 14.1 | 379.15 | 0.15 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | | 6.2 | 398.8 | 0.12 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | | 7.15 | 420.85 | 0.16 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | 22GPRC004 | 17 | 41 | 0.13 | Outside historical resource area | | | 8 | 243 | 0.15 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | 22GPRC005 | 30 | 8 | 0.26 | Inside historical resource area | | | 23 | 64 | 0.12 | Below historical resource area | | 22GPRC006 | 9 | 48 | 0.20 | Below historical resource area | | Incl | 8 | 86 | 0.30 | | | | 49 | 65 | 0.17 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | | 29 | 160 | 0.15 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | | 6 | 238 | 0.27 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area | | | 13.5 | 250 | 0.14 | Diamond tail. Below historical resource area. To end of hole | | 22GPRC007 | 21 | 2 | 0.30 | Inside historical resource area, to end of hole, abandoned in old workings | | 22GPDD008 | 8 | 4 | 0.20 | Diamond cored hole. Inside historical resource area | | | 14 | 24 | 0.20 | Diamond cored hole. Inside historical resource area | | | 13 | 134 | 0.15 | Diamond cored hole. Outside historical resource area | | | 4 | 171 | 0.25 | Diamond cored hole. Outside historical resource area | | 22GPRC009 | | | | No significant mineralization | | 22GPDD010 | | | | Diamond cored hole. No assayed returned yet | | 22GPRC011 | 5 | 1 | 0.41 | Predominantly outside historical resource area | | | 25 | 12 | 0.16 | Predominantly outside historical resource area | | | 7 | 42 | 0.30 | Predominantly outside historical resource area | | | 4 | 82 | 0.40 | Predominantly outside historical resource area | | 22GPRC012 | 78 | 11 | 0.51 | Predominantly outside historical resource area | | Incl | 23 | 34 | 1.09 | Outside historical resource area | | | 8 | 122 | 0.27 | Outside historical resource area | | 22GPRC013 | 20 | 3 | 0.14 | Inside historical resource area | | | 14 | 36 | 0.16 | Below historical resource area | | | 6 | 105 | 0.13 | Below historical resource area | | 22GPRC014 | 5 | 16 | 0.27 | Inside historical resource area | | | 12 | 26 | 0.20 | Inside historical resource area | | | 48.8 | 87 | 0.14 | Outside historical resource area. Part RC, part diamond tail | | | 5 | 171 | 0.13 | Diamond tail. Outside historical resource area | | 22GPDD015 | 48 | 12 | 0.15 | Diamond hole. Predominantly within historical resource area | | Incl | 3 | 34 | 0.68 | | | 22GPRC016 | 51 | 2 | 0.29 | Inside historical resource area | | Incl | 20 | 4 | 0.43 | | | 22GPRC017 | 9 | 39 | 0.20 | Outside historical resource area | | | 11 | 66 | 0.10 | Outside historical resource area | | 22GPRC018A | | | | No significant assays – diamond tail yet to be assayed | | 22GPRC019 | | | | No significant assays | | 22GPRC021 | 40 | 58 | 0.13 | Outside historical resource area | | | 14 | 128 | 0.36 | Outside historical resource area. Part RC, part diamond tail | | | 17 | 181 | 0.21 | Outside historical resource area | | 22GPRC022 | 15 | 22 | 0.45 | Inside historical resource area, to end of hole, abandoned in old workings | | 22GPDD023 | | | | Diamond cored hole. No significant results. Only partially assayed | | 22GPRC024 | 21 | 16 | 0.22 | Inside historical resource area | | | 14 | 47 | 0.10 | Inside historical resource area |

| | | NOTES: All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres. | | All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain. | | TinOne drill hole numbering is in the form 22GPRCXXX for reverse circulation ( RC) holes and 22GPRDDXXX for diamond holes with numbering allocated in sequence. | | Analytical results have been received for holes 22GPRC002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 009, 011, 012, 013, 014, 016, 017, 018A, 019, 021, 022 and 024. Hole 22GPRC020 failed at 12 metres and was not assayed. The target area for this hole was drilled by 22GPRC021. | | Diamond holes completed to-date and with assays pending are 22GPDD10 and 22GPDD023 (Part). Diamond tail extensions have been completed for RC pre-collar holes 22GPRC003, 22GPRC004, 22GPRC005, 22GPRC006, 22GPRC014 and 22GPRC021 with assays pending for 22GPRC018A. | | |

_Table 2: __Great Pyramid historical drill results. _

| Hole | Intersection width (m) | From (m) | Sn (%) | Year | Company | Comments | | 18GPD001 | 52.2 | 1.5 | 0.29 | 2018 | TNT Mines Ltd | Diamond hole | | | 11 | 60 | 0.11 | | | | | | 30 | 180 | 0.27 | | | | | | 15 | 234 | 0.11 | | | | | BHP001 | 16.45 | 22.56 | 0.20 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP002 | 15.24 | 0 | 0.22 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | | 10.98 | 24.38 | 0.12 | 1965 | BHP | | | BHP005 | 16.46 | 4.27 | 0.12 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP006 | 3.66 | 29.87 | 0.47 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP007 | 34.75 | 0.61 | 0.25 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP008 | 14.63 | 20.73 | 0.15 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP011 | 17.07 | 0 | 0.23 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP013 | 13.41 | 0 | 0.22 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP014 | 49.38 | 9.75 | 0.14 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP015 | 6.1 | 0 | 0.34 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | | 9.15 | 13.41 | 0.19 | 1965 | BHP | | | BHP020 | 32.11 | 6.9 | 0.36 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BHP026 | 29.26 | 11.58 | 0.17 | 1965 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BPD001 | 39.4 | 15.7 | 0.15 | 1980 | BHP | Diamond hole | | BPD002b | 28 | 0 | 0.21 | 1980 | BHP | Percussion hole | | BPD003 | 24.55 | 31.7 | 0.30 | 1981 | BHP | Diamond hole | | BPD005 | 14.8 | 0 | 0.17 | 1981 | BHP | Diamond hole | | BPD007 | 19 | 0 | 0.16 | 1981 | BHP | Diamond hole | | | 38.61 | 66.25 | 0.30 | 1981 | BHP | | | BPD009a | 26.65 | 21.75 | 0.18 | 1981 | BHP | Diamond hole | | BPD009b | 14 | 4 | 0.53 | 1981 | BHP | Percussion hole | | | 18 | 24 | 0.14 | 1981 | BHP | | | BPD010 | 33.3 | 14.8 | 0.25 | 1981 | BHP | Diamond hole | | BPD011 | 14.84 | 22.36 | 0.11 | 1981 | BHP | Diamond hole | | | 10.74 | 64.3 | 0.13 | | | | | | 13.75 | 113.8 | 0.12 | | | | | DDS001 | 16.61 | 164.59 | 0.10 | 1965 | BHP | Diamond hole | | GPY001 | 10.66 | 28.96 | 0.15 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Diamond hole | | GPY002 | 18.29 | 3.05 | 0.13 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Diamond hole | | | 24.38 | 45.72 | 0.21 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | | | GPY003 | 28.95 | 10.67 | 0.43 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Diamond hole | | | 35.05 | 44.2 | 0.28 | | | | | GPY005 | 56.39 | 0 | 0.27 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Diamond hole | | GPY006 | 44.2 | 0 | 0.39 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Diamond hole | | MD001 | 10.66 | 137.7 | 0.20 | 1976 | Tas. Mines Dept | Diamond hole | | MD003 | 12 | 27.88 | 0.23 | 1977 | Tas. Mines Dept | Diamond hole | | MD004 | 10.82 | 15.68 | 0.20 | 1978 | Tas. Mines Dept | Diamond hole | | | 11.07 | 75.2 | 0.18 | | | | | SPG1a | 10 | 30 | 0.24 | 1983 | Shell | Percussion with diamond tail from 121m | | | 14 | 72 | 0.12 | | | | | | 42.9 | 236.7 | 0.22 | | | | | | 10.2 | 291.8 | 0.15 | | | | | H001 | 16.84 | 4.5 | 0.31 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H002 | 10.67 | 12.19 | 0.14 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 9.14 | 30.48 | 0.13 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H003 | 9.14 | 13.72 | 0.22 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H004 | 42.67 | 0 | 0.22 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H005 | 30.48 | 13.72 | 0.45 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H006 | 16.77 | 9.14 | 0.33 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H007 | 7.62 | 1.52 | 0.35 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 30.48 | 15.24 | 0.16 | | | | | H008 | 27.43 | 0 | 0.29 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 13.72 | 32 | 0.25 | | | | | H010 | 13.72 | 1.52 | 0.34 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 10.67 | 32 | 0.11 | | | | | H014 | 32.01 | 1.52 | 0.25 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H015 | 21.34 | 1.52 | 0.24 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H016 | 22.86 | 4.57 | 0.22 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H017 | 35.06 | 1.52 | 0.27 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H018 | 19.82 | 9.14 | 0.13 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H019 | 21.34 | 0 | 0.29 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H020 | 10.67 | 7.62 | 0.14 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 12.19 | 22.86 | 0.41 | | | | | H021 | 10.67 | 0 | 0.27 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 16.77 | 19.81 | 0.15 | | | | | H022 | 6.1 | 0 | 0.33 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 15.24 | 12.19 | 0.17 | | | | | H024 | 6.1 | 0 | 0.37 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 22.86 | 10.67 | 0.21 | | | | | H025 | 12.19 | 6.1 | 0.16 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H026 | 24.38 | 7.62 | 0.25 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H028 | 30.48 | 0 | 0.18 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H032 | 9.14 | 7.62 | 0.33 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H034 | 10.67 | 22.86 | 0.23 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H036 | 10.67 | 1.52 | 0.20 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H037 | 18.29 | 16.76 | 0.18 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H038 | 12.19 | 12.19 | 0.11 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H041 | 30.48 | 0 | 0.36 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H042 | 36.58 | 0 | 0.26 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H043 | 28.96 | 0 | 0.39 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H044 | 24.38 | 0 | 0.39 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H045 | 15.24 | 1.52 | 0.18 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H046 | 16.77 | 4.57 | 0.27 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H047 | 6.09 | 3.05 | 0.34 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H049 | 15.24 | 1.52 | 0.14 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 9.14 | 30.48 | 0.14 | | | | | H051 | 27.44 | 1.52 | 0.49 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H052 | 22.86 | 1.52 | 0.33 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H053 | 9.15 | 4.57 | 0.27 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 4.57 | 18.29 | 0.58 | | | | | H054 | 24.39 | 4.57 | 0.72 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H055 | 25.91 | 1.52 | 0.37 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H056 | 24.38 | 6.1 | 0.34 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H057 | 10.67 | 7.62 | 0.13 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H061 | 12.2 | 1.52 | 0.18 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H062 | 32.01 | 12.19 | 0.18 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H063 | 7.62 | 3.05 | 0.39 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 10.67 | 22.86 | 0.16 | | | | | H064 | 9.14 | 3.05 | 0.34 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H065 | 9.15 | 27.43 | 0.42 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H066 | 24.39 | 1.52 | 0.25 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H068 | 12.19 | 10.67 | 0.23 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H069 | 10.67 | 24.38 | 0.19 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H072 | 6.09 | 6.1 | 0.48 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H080 | 10.67 | 1.52 | 0.31 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H081 | 27.43 | 6.1 | 0.15 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H082 | 25.91 | 15.24 | 0.34 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H087 | 16.77 | 12.19 | 0.13 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H092 | 10.67 | 4.57 | 0.13 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H095 | 16.76 | 15.24 | 0.13 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H096 | 10.66 | 13.72 | 0.22 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H097 | 6.09 | 21.34 | 1.23 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H102 | 10.67 | 3.05 | 0.23 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H103 | 18.29 | 1.52 | 0.64 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H105 | 9.15 | 9.14 | 0.35 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 10.66 | 28.96 | 0.18 | | | | | H107 | 10.67 | 24.38 | 0.12 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H108 | 21.34 | 4.57 | 0.18 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 12.19 | 30.48 | 0.15 | | | | | H109 | 10.67 | 3.05 | 0.20 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H111 | 10.67 | 10.67 | 0.86 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 9.15 | 27.43 | 0.21 | | | | | H114 | 13.72 | 19.81 | 0.19 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H122 | 27.43 | 3.05 | 0.26 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H123b | 39.62 | 3.05 | 0.27 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H124 | 10.67 | 25.91 | 0.19 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H126 | 7.62 | 21.34 | 0.45 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H128 | 9.14 | 3.05 | 0.27 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H130 | 10.67 | 15.24 | 0.23 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | | 9.14 | 30.48 | 0.15 | | | | | H131 | 10.67 | 3.05 | 0.43 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H132 | 27.43 | 6.1 | 0.22 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole | | H135 | 10.66 | 21.34 | 0.14 | 1970 | Aberfoyle Ltd | Percussion hole |

Earlier from TinOne Resources Inc.